Search results
The Supreme Court Wants Nothing to Do With Homelessness
New Republic· 6 hours agoJustice Neil Gorsuch suggested that even without the Eighth Amendment to rely upon, a homeless...
Supreme Court appears skeptical of rulings that found public sleeping ban violated Constitution
Politico via Yahoo News· 21 hours ago“How about if there are no public bathroom facilities?” Justice Neil Gorsuch asked. “Do people have...
What to know in the Supreme Court case about immunity for former President Trump
San Francisco Chronicle· 3 hours agoThe Supreme Court has scheduled a special session to hear arguments over whether former President...
Hillary Clinton Says 'Trump Did This' Over Rise In Pregnant Women Being Denied ER Care
HuffPost· 23 hours agoIn January, Trump...
Supreme Court Will Take Up the Legal Fight Over Ghost Guns
Time Magazine· 19 hours agoThe justices by a 5-4 vote had previously intervened to keep the regulation in effect during the...
Supreme Court justices pin Biden’s solicitor general on selective prosecution
World Tribune· 20 hours agoJustices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito alluded to inconsistencies with Biden pursuing Jan. 6...
A Supreme Court Case About the Rights of Homeless People Went Better Than Expected
Slate via Yahoo News· 18 hours agoOnly Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch questioned the legitimacy of Robinson....
Supreme Court Conservatives Likely To Roll Back Homeless Rights
HuffPost via Yahoo News· 19 hours agoWith these two groups of justices on clear sides, the court’s decision will be made by the four...
With homelessness on the rise, the Supreme Court weighs bans on sleeping outdoors
Philly.com· 2 hours agoThe Supreme Court wrestled with major questions about the growing issue of homelessness on Monday as...
Justices Likely to Revive Oregon City’s Ban on Public Sleeping
Bloomberg Law· 23 hours agoMuch of the two-and-a-half-hour argument focused on whether laws that essentially punish individuals for sleeping public are based on conduct or status. Previous Supreme Court precedent said ...