Search results
Ending Section 230 Would Kill the Internet as We Know It
Reason.com via Yahoo News· 2 days agoTom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Newscom Described as "the 26 words that created the internet," Section 230...
Lawmakers debate ending Section 230 in order to save it
The Verge· 3 days agoA pair of legislators have a plan to save Section 230: kill it so that Congress is forced to come up...
A professor tries to turn the tables on Section 230’s web protections - Marketplace
Marketplace· 4 days agoThe internet today is largely governed by 26 words in the Communications Decency Act, signed on Feb....
Lawmakers say Section 230 repeal will protect children—opponents predict chaos
Ars Technica· 3 days agoA proposed repeal of Section 230 is designed to punish Big Tech but is also facing opposition from...
Sunsetting Section 230 Will Hurt Internet Users, Not Big Tech
Electronic Frontier Foundations· 5 days agoThis Wednesday, Congress will hold a hearing on a bill that would end Section 230 in 18 months. As EFF has said for years, Section < ...
AI shakes up Section 230 debate
Axios· 4 days agoThe proposal aims to foster substantive discussions on how to revamp Section 230 by giving a deadline of Dec. 31, 2025, to rework tech's liability shield...
Tech Bytes — Week in Review: Online extremism, Section 230, and ScarJo vs. OpenAI - Marketplace
Marketplace· 2 days agoActress Scarlett Johansson said this week the company approached her twice to voice a new AI...
Libraries, Wikipedia, Others Blast Proposed Section 230 Repeal
MediaPost· 4 days agoA bill that would repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act at the end of next year is drawing opposition from groups including the American ...
Why Section 230 needs an overhaul
The Daily Sentinel· 3 days agoWhat is Section 230? It was enacted in 1996 to provide internet platforms with a “sword and shield” framework — legal protections for the content that users ...
Opinion | For the Sake of Free Speech, Keep Section 230
The Wall Street Journal· 3 days agoConservative speech might be the first to go under the justification of increased legal risk.
