Search results
Supreme Court Rules NLRB 10(j) Injunctions Must Meet Higher Preliminary Injunction Standard in Blow...
The National Law Review· 2 days agoIn Starbucks v. McKinney, the Supreme Court of the United States clarified the standard for...
Supreme Court Decides Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, Regional Director of Region 15 of the National...
JD Supra· 2 days agoOn June 13, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Starbucks Corporation v. McKinney, No. 23-367, holding that courts evaluating a request for a preliminary ...
Supreme Court Clarifies Standard for NLRB Preliminary Injunctions
The National Law Review· 2 days agoOn June 13, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Starbucks v. McKinney and, in doing so,...
Supreme Court Starbucks ruling seen as gift to corporate union-busters
The Raw Story· 3 days agoIn an 8-1 decision—with liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting—the justices in Starbucks v...
Supreme Court Hands NLRB a Piping Hot Wake-Up Call
The National Law Review· 3 days agoA mostly unanimous U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a National Labor Relations Board request for preliminary injunctive relief, while unfair labor...
Why Was Ketanji Brown Jackson Made to Stand Alone for the Rights of Starbucks Workers?
Slate via Yahoo News· 3 days agoIn Starbucks v. McKinney, the court made it harder for the government to quickly force an employer...
Justices side with Starbucks in union organizing dispute - SCOTUSblog
SCOTUSblog· 3 days agoThe April argument in Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney suggested a bench so pervasively skeptical of the...
U.S. Supreme Court Addresses 10(j) Injunction Standard in NLRB Case
The National Law Review· 2 days agoIn an 8-1 decision authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, the United States Supreme Court settled the...
Supreme Court’s anti-union Starbucks ruling lands a blow to workers rights
The Independent via Yahoo News· 3 days agoJustice Ketanji Brown Jackson filed an opinion concurring in part but rejected part of the court’s...
Supreme Court sides with Starbucks in labor case that could hinder government’s ability to intervene...
San Francisco Chronicle· 3 days agoOn June 13, 2024, the court announced that eight of the nine justices had signed onto a decision, written by Justice Clarence Thomas, on the Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney ...