Ad
related to: GIBNEY, J. Triton Realty Limited Partnership and Triton Realty, Inc. (“the plaintiffs), plaintiffs in the above-captioned cases, have moved the Court for an order consolidating these two cases for the purposes of pretrial discovery and pretrial motions. As grounds for this motion, the plaintiffs assert that there are questions of law and fact common to both causes of action, that the various parties involved in the two actions may have interests in the resolution of issues raised in each of the cases, and that the consolidation will further the goal of judicial economy. Burlington Insurance Company objected to the motion, but has since been dismissed from case No. 04-2335. The motion was argued before the Court on January 12, 2005, at which time Burlington voiced objections to consolidation. C.A. No. 04-2335 and C.A.
Search results
We did not find results for: GIBNEY, J. Triton Realty Limited Partnership and Triton Realty, Inc. (“the plaintiffs), plaintiffs in the above-captioned cases, have moved the Court for an order consolidating these two cases for the purposes of pretrial discovery and pretrial motions. As grounds for this motion, the plaintiffs assert that there are questions of law and fact common to both causes of action, that the various parties involved in the two actions may have interests in the resolution of issues raised in each of the cases, and that the consolidation will further the goal of judicial economy. Burlington Insurance Company objected to the motion, but has since been dismissed from case No. 04-2335. The motion was argued before the Court on January 12, 2005, at which time Burlington voiced objections to consolidation. C.A. No. 04-2335 and C.A..
Try the suggestions below or type a new query above.
Suggestions:
- Check your spelling.
- Try more general words.
- Try different words that mean the same thing.
