Ad
related to: what is title vii of the civil rights act of 1964
Search results
SCOTUS Decides That A Position Transfer May Violate Title VII If An Employee is Worse Off Due to...
The National Law Review· 7 hours agoEmployers contemplating a forced transfer of a worker will need to grapple with a new standard set...
Supreme Court Rejects Heightened Harm Requirement In Title VII Discrimination Case | JD Supra
JD Supra· 15 hours agoSupreme Court ruled in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri that an employee challenging a job transfer under Title VII of the Civil
Supreme Court Finds Lateral Transfer Discriminatory Under Title VII | JD Supra
JD Supra· 15 hours agoIn order to demonstrate discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, plaintiffs ...
SCOTUS Issues Highly Anticipated Muldrow Decision, Rejecting Heightened Harm Requirement in Adverse...
JD Supra· 15 hours agoIn Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, the Court considered whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964< ...
Supreme Court Adopts New Standard for Establishing Adverse Employment Action Element in Title VII...
JD Supra· 15 hours ago...significant disadvantage” standard frequently applied by federal courts in determining the extent of harm necessary for an employee to establish that a job transfer is an adverse employment action for purposes of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) and ruled that an employee may...
Insignificant Harm Not So Insignificant in Proving Title VII Transfer Violation - SCOTUS Today
The National Law Review· 2 days agoA unanimous Supreme Court has eased the route for a plaintiff to prove a violation of Title VII of...
Sheetz hit with discrimination lawsuit
FOX 8 Cleveland· 12 hours agoThe Sheetz convenience store chain has been hit with a lawsuit by federal officials who allege the company discriminated against minority job applicants.
Federal Appellate Court Finds That Title VII Bans Gender Identity Discrimination
The National Law Review· 3 days agoThe US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled on March 7, 2018, that workplace discrimination on the basis of gender identity and gender expression violates Title < ...
Supreme Court Rules Employees Need Not Show Transfer Caused ‘Significant’ Harm For Title VII Claims...
JD Supra· 2 days agoOn April 17, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States held that an employee challenging a job transfer in an unlawful employment discrimination claim under Title
Supreme Court Expands Employer Risk Of Discrimination Claims
Forbes· 2 days agoWhile some critics of corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts had suggested that the...
